6 research outputs found

    Effects of SMS Texting on Academic Writing Skills of Undergraduate Students at a Public Sector University in Pakistan

    Get PDF
    The growing concern about the use of texting endangering the standard forms in language prompted the present research to determine the presence or absence of SMS features in the academic writing of the participants. Triangulation was used for data collection i.e. questionnaires for learners and educators and samples of the learners’ English written work were examined for SMS features. Simple average and ratio were used for descriptive analysis of the data. Contrary to the expectation, there were no significant evidences of these features in the sample. It seems being proficient in standard forms, these learners are context conscious and can switch to the appropriate register or style when writing formally .Thus the present study has demystified the popular belief about texting adversely affecting writing and thus destroying Standard English. Moreover, the evidences of one punctuation mark used in place of another indicate there can be other factors like carelessness or lack of knowledge of students and the lack of training, feedback or emphasis by educators or the system. So the matter of concern should be the general neglect of punctuation even out of the context of texting. It is found that the higher the exposure to the SMS, more the negative effect on the writing skills of the university students. The excessive use of this medium is leading students towards writing wrong spellings and using SMS language’s short abbreviations that are not standard in examinations and daily academic work that is very harmful in academia. Keywords: Orthography, Phonetic Transcriptions, SMS (texting), Writing skills DOI: 10.7176/JLLL/75-05 Publication date: January 31st 202

    W-rank: A keyphrase extraction method for webpage based on linguistics and DOM-base features

    No full text
    This paper addresses the problem of an automatic keyphrase extraction for a webpage text. Our method is unsupervised, and we call it W-rank. In our method, first we extract the text of a webpage and tokenize into three different candidate words list: unigram ,bigrams and noun phrases. Then we assign score to all words based on their individual appearance in linguistic and DOM-based feature sets. In the  final step, we rank these candidate words using score and select top 5 keyphrase from each list and combine them as a final keyphrases for a given webpage. We focus more on the relevancy of keyphrases to its content using linguistic features. We compare our method with other methods using precision, recall and f-score. The experimental result shows, W-rank improves the performance of our previous method D-rank and outperforms other state of art methods

    Quality of Experience Assessment of Video Quality in Social Clouds

    No full text
    Video sharing on social clouds is popular among the users around the world. High-Definition (HD) videos have big file size so the storing in cloud storage and streaming of videos with high quality from cloud to the client are a big problem for service providers. Social clouds compress the videos to save storage and stream over slow networks to provide quality of service (QoS). Compression of video decreases the quality compared to original video and parameters are changed during the online play as well as after download. Degradation of video quality due to compression decreases the quality of experience (QoE) level of end users. To assess the QoE of video compression, we conducted subjective (QoE) experiments by uploading, sharing, and playing videos from social clouds. Three popular social clouds, Facebook, Tumblr, and Twitter, were selected to upload and play videos online for users. The QoE was recorded by using questionnaire given to users to provide their experience about the video quality they perceive. Results show that Facebook and Twitter compressed HD videos more as compared to other clouds. However, Facebook gives a better quality of compressed videos compared to Twitter. Therefore, users assigned low ratings for Twitter for online video quality compared to Tumblr that provided high-quality online play of videos with less compression
    corecore